The perspective one has of society's creation and one's role in it.***
Not* Exactly[!]
[Ideology and Iowa are a lot like the eye of the needle or camel.(no pun)]
[Perspective: to be processed later more or less...[!]
Speaking of ant or fable TV. Democrats cannot afford to have distractions or liars, just because "the Right" does it. Speaking of irrelative**: ant:Anthony, Ed:Rush,(or Beck Or Reck) Whiner:BaneOr, silver lining:golden rule, objective/subjective ]
* iOWa, iRreleFont? Rachel Maddow discusses the "small i" people. But then, eye had not seen her comments.
** something about relative in regards to the differences in ideologies and personalities on spectrum ofor loopiness on the left or right.
***[Media(sources) a side: wMD: I may go on or take hiatus but the bottomline is the top line is mine. i.e. I have only begun the Mike Cormack book, and I am not quoting it. Ibid this bracket.(Thanks to truthout.org for this last crack, not the book]
[!]Hi Ate Us, interesting Try Angle or Segue(way)[]. Or Tr(eye)i Pod?
A.B.C.D...
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts with label Common Dreams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Common Dreams. Show all posts
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
The Choice
Forward or Back.
Speaking of back, I know that Dorothy was not the one with the Tea Party, but Alice had the preemptive dream not to be stuck on a party theme.
Meanwhile Ed Schultz made some interesting progress, and Norman Goldman covers the same issue or Harry Reed calling out Obama. Well... not exactly. My preemptive analysis is that maybe it is good cop, bad cop routine, with several caveats. They aren't cops, they aren't just good or bad, and they aren't even the same branch of government. When it come to courage and pragmatism there is a difference between legislating and administering, and how their leadership is navigated, not to mention running the national or states governments, and their party navigations. A caller soon after with Ed, suggested that this was orchestrated, well... maybe. Who let the dogs out. Woof, woof. They are not dogs* either, but they are giving license to each other and are tugging on our leashes.
*Actually there are blue dogs, yellow dogs and maybe green or purple dogs.
[On the other hand, who knows? ...but comparing other countries debt concerns does not reflect their relative investment in infrastructure, social and jobs policies.]
Speaking of back, I know that Dorothy was not the one with the Tea Party, but Alice had the preemptive dream not to be stuck on a party theme.
Meanwhile Ed Schultz made some interesting progress, and Norman Goldman covers the same issue or Harry Reed calling out Obama. Well... not exactly. My preemptive analysis is that maybe it is good cop, bad cop routine, with several caveats. They aren't cops, they aren't just good or bad, and they aren't even the same branch of government. When it come to courage and pragmatism there is a difference between legislating and administering, and how their leadership is navigated, not to mention running the national or states governments, and their party navigations. A caller soon after with Ed, suggested that this was orchestrated, well... maybe. Who let the dogs out. Woof, woof. They are not dogs* either, but they are giving license to each other and are tugging on our leashes.
*Actually there are blue dogs, yellow dogs and maybe green or purple dogs.
[On the other hand, who knows? ...but comparing other countries debt concerns does not reflect their relative investment in infrastructure, social and jobs policies.]
Monday, June 07, 2010
Head Hunters?
Actually I am looking for a new job.
Rabbilive.com interviewed Helen Thomas.
Now she has been forced to retire in an ironic atmosphere. Of course she is a journalist and she should have been more careful with her words, or not even held an opinion or at least not mentioned it or done an interview.** Ironically it is hard to extend that consistency to the likes of the Right where journalism and opinion are so connected there would be a whole lot of job openings if it were to be applied across the board. It would also be hard for her to be turned down by some speakers boards*. But then we are back to the irony.
(or Try Un Ism)
* of course given market forces it would still be a risk
** even this may be to harsh an analysis: one would think that she said that Jews should get out of Israel. That is a flat out error by CNN.***
[There is no defending the conclusion that has been reached by those that have listened to Helen Thomas, yet that is a double-edged sword. The conclusion is unjustified that all Jews should get out of Israel, it is also not necessarily what she implied. The challenge is to find a true transcript of her answers to the questions and then not ask "what if's" that are equally off base, especially behind her back.]
*** ["Thomas was then asked where the Jews in Israel should go? Thomas responded, "They should go home," which the White House reporter identified as "Poland, Germany ... and America and everywhere else."] The bold is not confirmed by the original on Rabbilive.com]
Rabbilive.com interviewed Helen Thomas.
Now she has been forced to retire in an ironic atmosphere. Of course she is a journalist and she should have been more careful with her words, or not even held an opinion or at least not mentioned it or done an interview.** Ironically it is hard to extend that consistency to the likes of the Right where journalism and opinion are so connected there would be a whole lot of job openings if it were to be applied across the board. It would also be hard for her to be turned down by some speakers boards*. But then we are back to the irony.
(or Try Un Ism)
* of course given market forces it would still be a risk
** even this may be to harsh an analysis: one would think that she said that Jews should get out of Israel. That is a flat out error by CNN.***
[There is no defending the conclusion that has been reached by those that have listened to Helen Thomas, yet that is a double-edged sword. The conclusion is unjustified that all Jews should get out of Israel, it is also not necessarily what she implied. The challenge is to find a true transcript of her answers to the questions and then not ask "what if's" that are equally off base, especially behind her back.]
*** ["Thomas was then asked where the Jews in Israel should go? Thomas responded, "They should go home," which the White House reporter identified as "Poland, Germany ... and America and everywhere else."] The bold is not confirmed by the original on Rabbilive.com]
Monday, October 12, 2009
Monday, April 06, 2009
ATLAS
MoveOn!
[O...I forgot the biggest hint/label of all, & link added.]
[O...I forgot the biggest hint/label of all, & link added.]
Labels:
Act Blue,
Adam Smith,
Ayn Rand,
Change.gov,
Checks and Balance,
Common Dreams,
Economics,
Escalation,
excuses,
Foreign Policy,
Geometry of purpose?,
MoveOn,
Obama,
Paul Krugman,
Poetic Justice
Friday, March 20, 2009
Commander-in-Chief Obama
[UPDATE 3-24-09: President Barack Obama on the Federal Budget: Four Principles ]
[Speaking of Battles: The real authoritarian v. populist.
The Battle Over the A.I.G. Bonuses: Class War in the Media ]
I never really did follow up on viewing or reading the bottom link at my Off The Cliff post, but used it as an allegorical leap. But here is a good point someone found regarding the Buffet comment.
From which I snip the point:
My point was the economics of the War on Terror where I said:
* and since what confused me about the Buffet report was his call for clarity, I have edited my grammar for that purpose here.
[Speaking of Battles: The real authoritarian v. populist.
The Battle Over the A.I.G. Bonuses: Class War in the Media ]
I never really did follow up on viewing or reading the bottom link at my Off The Cliff post, but used it as an allegorical leap. But here is a good point someone found regarding the Buffet comment.
From which I snip the point:
"What is required is a commander in chief that's looked at like a commander in chief in a time of war," Buffett said.Commander-in-Chief? Where have we heard that before?
My point was the economics of the War on Terror where I said:
The honesty of the new budget and accounting now includes the war on terror which was not on the books. So rather than declare, a win or lose the economy bifurcation, the new accounting must include the soft power ingredients which do not come free. I have not seen where this is said, but it should and probably has been or will be.Now the bottom line is what is pre-emptive.And should be a uniter not a divider.
* and since what confused me about the Buffet report was his call for clarity, I have edited my grammar for that purpose here.
Thursday, February 05, 2009
Labels (II)
Labels:
Checks and Balance,
CJR,
Clinton,
CNN,
Colbert Report,
Common Dreams,
Constitutional,
Darcy Burner,
David Sirota,
Dean,
Dean Baker,
Debate,
Democracy Now,
Democratic Candidates,
Depak Chopra
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
(WMD) Wisdom's Mass Deployment
Matthews finally gets there.
Previous Chatter.
Sophistry aside?*
Alexander Hamilton's Advice To The Obama Administration. by Thom Hartmann CommonDreams.org
* Matthew's and Hamilton's bad rap in their respective fields (Journalism and Finance)
Previous Chatter.
Sophistry aside?*
Alexander Hamilton's Advice To The Obama Administration. by Thom Hartmann CommonDreams.org
* Matthew's and Hamilton's bad rap in their respective fields (Journalism and Finance)
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Key Read
This is one of my first implementations of change:
Post Obama, or Pre-Obama-Nation.
Key(new label) reference Navigation(old label), See Foreign Policy (ongoing label)
Search WaPo, not looking back, or contributor. (Embedded works.)
Obama to Explore New Approach in Afghanistan War
The Washington Post - Karen DeYoung, Staff Writer. (nfry)*
* don't forget that this site is easily search-able in the top left corner
as SEARCH BLOG, and CTRL F, on your keyboard,
and NAVIGATION was a label that I used in reference to our course and change. Example: Help!
OK, it is a bit loopy**, but that is like progress:
It is a heckuva harder job to build on than trickle down on.
** see nature of change in regards to labels and sorting technologies Note: the difference between LABEL and top of right column.
[Speaking of Embedded, Dean is a fork in the road. The Game.]
[To Read, one, two, three, four, in yet to be determined order]
[already read: Edwards moves on link.]
Post Obama, or Pre-Obama-Nation.
Key(new label) reference Navigation(old label), See Foreign Policy (ongoing label)
Search WaPo, not looking back, or contributor. (Embedded works.)
Obama to Explore New Approach in Afghanistan War
The Washington Post - Karen DeYoung, Staff Writer. (nfry)*
* don't forget that this site is easily search-able in the top left corner
as SEARCH BLOG, and CTRL F, on your keyboard,
and NAVIGATION was a label that I used in reference to our course and change. Example: Help!
OK, it is a bit loopy**, but that is like progress:
It is a heckuva harder job to build on than trickle down on.
** see nature of change in regards to labels and sorting technologies Note: the difference between LABEL and top of right column.
[Speaking of Embedded, Dean is a fork in the road. The Game.]
[To Read, one, two, three, four, in yet to be determined order]
[already read: Edwards moves on link.]
Labels:
Common Dreams,
Dean,
Foreign Policy,
Karen DeYoung,
Key,
Navigation,
TruthOut,
WaPo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)